md link fix

[LadyBluenotes]

maybe?

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Refactor
  • Optimized component rendering context with no user-visible changes.

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for tanstack ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	3426f91
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/projects/tanstack/deploys/69e6af72cd23040008899e6a
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-840--tanstack.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.
Lighthouse	1 paths audited Performance: 33 (🔴 down 23 from production) Accessibility: 90 (no change from production) Best Practices: 83 (🔴 down 9 from production) SEO: 97 (no change from production) PWA: 70 (no change from production) View the detailed breakdown and full score reports

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 0c6cd4df-73cb-4e57-b482-821940a8d186

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5ff8101 and 3426f91.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• src/components/markdown/MarkdownLink.tsx

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The 'use client' directive was added to src/components/markdown/MarkdownLink.tsx, marking the module for client-side execution in a Next.js environment. No functional logic, component props, or control flow were modified.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Client Directive Addition src/components/markdown/MarkdownLink.tsx	Added 'use client' directive to enable client-side rendering context for the MarkdownLink component.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

🐰 A hop, a skip, to the client we go!
The MarkdownLink now wears its badge with a glow,
No logic changed, just a directive so fine,
Server steps back, client takes the line! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title check	❓ Inconclusive	The title 'md link fix' is vague and generic, using non-specific terms that don't clearly convey what the actual change is—adding a 'use client' directive to a component file.	Consider a more descriptive title that explains the actual change, such as 'Add use client directive to MarkdownLink component' or 'Mark MarkdownLink as client component'.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

📝 Generate docstrings

• Create stacked PR
• Commit on current branch

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch link-fix

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}